Brigandine Abyss Review: Grand Strategy Ambitions Undermined by Repetitive Combat and Narrative Missteps

The tactical role-playing game genre has seen countless iterations since its golden era on the original PlayStation, but few franchises have carved out such a distinctive niche as Brigandine. When the original game launched in 1998, it distinguished itself from contemporaries like Final Fantasy Tactics and Vandal Hearts by incorporating a macro-level strategic layer that felt more aligned with PC strategy gaming traditions. Players conquered territories across an expansive continental map, managing resources and preparing forces before engaging in hex-based tactical combat. This unique fusion of grand strategy and turn-based battles attracted a devoted cult following, even as the series remained dormant for two decades until publisher Happinet revived it with Brigandine: Legend of Runersia in 2020 for Nintendo Switch and PlayStation 4.

Now, with a significantly shorter wait between entries, Happinet has partnered with developer Adglobe—the studio behind the critically acclaimed Ender Lilies and Ender Magnolia—to deliver Brigandine Abyss. This latest installment maintains the core strategic framework that defined its predecessors while attempting to broaden its appeal to newcomers unfamiliar with the series’ demanding mechanics. Unfortunately, in pursuit of accessibility, the game sacrifices much of the mechanical depth and narrative coherence that made earlier entries so memorable, resulting in an experience that may satisfy neither hardcore fans nor the broader audience it seeks to attract.

A Continent Consumed by Darkness

Brigandine Abyss unfolds on the continent of Meltitea, a land thrust into chaos when the Kingdom of Solginat falls to internal treachery. The king’s advisor, corrupted by a malevolent force called the Abyss, orchestrates a coup and establishes the Abyssloa Empire, launching a campaign of conquest across the entire continent. Players select from six distinct factions, each occupying different starting positions on the map and possessing unique motivations for opposing the Empire. The Scarlet Will, a mercenary company loyal to the deposed king, protects the fleeing princess while seeking vengeance against former allies who betrayed their homeland. Other factions offer more unconventional narratives, including Pandemyuon’s mad scientist leading an army of human experiments, and Gran Dragnica’s dragon tamers seeking justice for their mistreated kin.

This faction diversity theoretically provides substantial replay value, as each group faces different initial challenges and narrative arcs. However, the game’s attempt to accommodate such varied storylines within its open-ended structure creates significant problems. Event Battles—the primary vehicle for story progression—trigger after arbitrary numbers of seasons regardless of your actual campaign progress. You might have conquered half the continent and assembled an overwhelming military force, yet cutscenes still portray your faction as desperate underdogs fighting for survival. This disconnect between gameplay accomplishments and narrative presentation fundamentally undermines any investment in the story being told.

Strategic Depth in the Organization Phase

Where Brigandine Abyss truly shines is in its season-based campaign structure, which draws clear inspiration from grand strategy titans like Koei Tecmo’s Nobunaga’s Ambition and Firaxis Games’ Civilization series. Each season divides into three distinct phases that create a compelling rhythm of preparation, declaration, and execution. The Organization Phase consumes the majority of playtime as you manage your growing empire, assigning monster retinues to human commanders, completing quests for valuable resources, purchasing equipment from merchants, and developing both veteran soldiers and newly conquered territories.

The strategic considerations during this phase prove genuinely engaging. As your domain expands, you must carefully balance offensive ambitions against defensive necessities, positioning adequate forces to repel potential invasions while maintaining strike capabilities against rival holdings. The monster assignment system adds another layer of tactical consideration—each creature requires specific command points to deploy, and weaker monsters can provide powerful passive bonuses when rallied to their leader’s side rather than fighting independently. Building specialized platoons tailored to each commander’s strengths becomes an addictive metagame that rewards careful attention to unit synergies and role composition.

Combat Mechanics and Their Limitations

The actual tactical battles in Brigandine Abyss take place on large hexagonal grids, with each side deploying up to three human leaders accompanied by their monster retinues. The combat system incorporates sensible mechanics like Zone of Control, which prevents units from passing through hexes adjacent to enemies, enabling defensive formations that protect vulnerable commanders. With over twenty distinct classes offering unique abilities, there’s considerable variety in how battles can unfold. Rei Kondoh, whose work on Fire Emblem: Three Houses earned widespread acclaim, provides a suitably epic musical score that enhances the atmosphere of continent-spanning warfare.

However, the combat’s depth is severely undermined by structural issues inherent to the campaign design. Success requires fighting numerous battles during each Invasion Phase, especially as your territory grows. Most encounters share identical victory conditions and take place on unremarkable maps that lack interesting tactical features. The enemy AI compounds these problems by consistently making poor decisions, frequently exposing leaders to easy elimination rather than utilizing monster units as protective screens. Since defeating a leader causes their entire retinue to flee, battles become exercises in leader-hunting rather than genuine tactical puzzles. The removal of meaningful consequences for unit deaths—revival items are now plentifully available for purchase—further diminishes engagement during what should be the game’s most exciting moments.

Mission Mode Provides the Challenge Story Mode Lacks

For players seeking genuine strategic difficulty, Mission Mode emerges as Brigandine Abyss’s saving grace. This alternate mode unlocks all twenty-four factions of Meltitea, each with unique victory conditions that demand specialized approaches. While some missions maintain conventional objectives like continental conquest within time limits, others impose creative restrictions that force players to engage with mechanics in entirely fresh ways. Accumulating wealth to pay off massive debts, collecting specimens from every monster species, or completing campaigns with severely limited unit types all provide the kind of demanding gameplay that Story Mode abandons in pursuit of accessibility.

The presentation throughout both modes represents a notable step down from Legend of Runersia. Character artwork lacks the distinctive visual identity established by Raita Kazama in the previous entry, instead offering generic anime-style designs that fail to distinguish themselves from countless other fantasy games. Cutscenes appear infrequently and employ minimal animation, functioning barely above motion stills. Most leaders don’t receive unique battlefield models, instead using generic class-based appearances that squander the opportunity to make each character feel distinct during combat.

Brigandine Abyss ultimately struggles to reconcile its competing ambitions. The compelling strategic framework inherited from its predecessors remains intact, offering genuine depth in empire management and army composition. However, the repetitive combat encounters, disconnected storytelling, and reduced difficulty result in an experience that feels diluted. Mission Mode provides excellent value for players who enjoy crafting their own challenges, but those seeking the narrative satisfaction and measured progression that define the best strategy RPGs will find this entry frustrating. The foundation for an exceptional hybrid experience exists within Brigandine Abyss, but the execution fails to deliver on that potential.

Expert Opinion: Brigandine Abyss represents a cautionary tale about the risks of broadening appeal at the expense of core identity. While the grand strategy elements remain compelling, the series’ attempt to streamline tactical combat and accommodate varied narrative paths has resulted in a game that excels in preparation but falters in execution. Future entries would benefit from either fully committing to sandbox strategy gameplay or developing more sophisticated systems for integrating narrative progression with player-driven conquest.

Back To Top